Forcasting the future, or planning it

Newsmax published a story that Romney was the winner of the Nevada caucuses.  Problem was that the story was published on February 2, two days before the earliest results could have been known on February 4.  The story was pulled and then republished on the 4th, even though it was finally released 20 minutes before any results actually started coming in.  CNN and FOX chimed in that Romney was the winner when only 4% of the votes and been tallied.  And since then a precinct by precinct count of the votes has not been made available by the Nevada GOP.

Besides, it’s Romney’s turn.

Advertisements

About drrik

3rd career and 2nd childhood. Spends spare time repairing old things. Aspires to burn more gasoline, gunpowder, and ink in pursuit of slowing down. Child of the 60s and aspiring student of history. No desire to see us repeat the failed social experiments that keep failing for lack of human beings that meet the left wing standards and have to be killed off. Did engineering long enough to realize that very little is new and the wheel does not need to be reinvented.
This entry was posted in economy, election, mainstream media and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Forcasting the future, or planning it

  1. Mrs. AL says:

    Good one, Drrik!!!!!!!!!!

  2. thedrpete says:

    Every “news” outlet wants the scoop.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s