Couldn’t ‘a said it better

“There are enough laws on the books by Congress that are very clear in terms of how we have to enforce our immigration system that for me to simply, through executive order, ignore those congressional mandates would not conform with my appropriate role as President,” Presbo_March 2011.

And it would be unconstitutional, not that anyone’s minding.

So what do you call it when it is done, not by executive order, but by having your subordinate, Director of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano, just pretend that it IS the law of the land and start operating her unconstitutional agency under those guidelines?

Advertisements

About drrik

3rd career and 2nd childhood. Spends spare time repairing old things. Aspires to burn more gasoline, gunpowder, and ink in pursuit of slowing down. Child of the 60s and aspiring student of history. No desire to see us repeat the failed social experiments that keep failing for lack of human beings that meet the left wing standards and have to be killed off. Did engineering long enough to realize that very little is new and the wheel does not need to be reinvented.
This entry was posted in constitutional, economy, election, Obama and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Couldn’t ‘a said it better

  1. bullright says:

    Isn’t it funny how with everybody looking at Rubio, and he mentioned the issue, and amid declining polls, that Obama dumps this out there.

  2. drrik says:

    So does he garner enough Hispanic vote from the good will of the relatives of the illegals to make up for the votes he loses from all the unemployed Americans who now have one more contingent to compete with them for the few jobs out there?

    a. maybe, so it’s worth the risk since what he’s doing isn’t working anyhow
    b. no, but it doesn’t matter since the success of America was never the agenda and this just sows more confusion and chaos, just like Alinski wrote to do about destroying a country.

    • bullright says:

      I’d have to say “b” ; Dems usually don’t consider or underestimate coningency actions of their policies. (and sometimes they luck out) But I’m still not sure what we call it….it is by fiat whatever the name.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s